| Memo to: | All UH-Downtown/PS Holders | UH-Downtown/PS 02.B.06 | |
| From: | Max Castillo, President | Issue No. 1 | |
| Subject: | Staff Performance Evaluations Policy | Effective Date: 9/l/94 | |
| 1. PURPOSE This PS outlines the procedures by which staff performance evaluations shall be conducted. |
|
| 2 . DEFINITION | |
Performance appraisals highlight employees' strengths and weaknesses and provide the tools for establishing appropriate goals to achieve job gratification, personal growth and satisfactory job performance. Performance appraisals provide a periodic opportunity for communication between supervisors and employees to discuss expectations, goals and objectives of job performance and how well these are being met. |
|
| 3. POLICY/PROCEDURES | |
| 3.1 All full-time employees shall participate in annual performance evaluations designed to provide an appraisal of their job performance. Performance evaluations provide the opportunity for: | |
| 1. Consideration for salary adjustment based on merit; | |
| 2. Promoting individual growth; | |
| 3. Assessing job-related personal attributes; and | |
| 4. Increasing the awareness of supervisors and the Human Resources Director of the need for training and job enrichment. | |
| 3.2 Introductory Period Performance Evaluation forms(Exhibit A) shall be completed for all new employees at the end of their probationary period (six months). This includes current employees reassigned or transferred to a new job and/or area whose performance on the new job must be evaluated. Recommendation for regular employment is contingent on a satisfactory introductory period performance evaluation. | |
| 3.3 Annual performance appraisals (Exhibit B) shall be performed for all exempt and non-exempt University employees except for administrative staff, as delineated in PS 02.B.07, Administrative Staff Evaluation Policy. | |
| 3.4 The performance evaluation process comprises several steps. | |
3.4.1 Employees Self Appraisal. Supervisors shall seek employees' feedback and personal assessment of their job performance by requesting a Self Appraisal Form (Exhibit C) be completed. The self-appraisal will help supervisors evaluate the employee, develop strategies for improving weak areas, and set attainable goals for the next appraisal period. |
|
| 3.4.2 Managerial Preparation for the Appraisal. Prior to conducting performance appraisals, supervisors will identify and develop items to be covered in the session. Relevant data concerning job requirements and established goals and standards will be gathered. Employees' performance for the evaluation period will be assessed based on the above criteria. Supervisors will then: | |
| 1. Review the job requirements; | |
| 2. Review the goals and standards previously discussed and agreed upon with the employee; | |
| 3. Review the employee's history including job skills, training, experience, special or unique qualifications, and past jobs and job performance; | |
| 4. Review the employee's self-appraisal; | |
5. Evaluate job Performance versus job expectations for the period being appraised and rate accordingly; |
|
6. Note any variances in the employee's performance that need to be discussed and provide specific examples; and |
|
| 7. Consider career opportunities or limitations for the employee and prepare to discuss them. | |
3.4.3 Reviewing Appraisal Discussion Models Overall evaluations will range from excellent to poor. An approach to the appraisal discussion must be selected to fit the evaluation. |
|
1. If the overall evaluation is excellent, the discussion should focus on promotion opportunities, growth in present position, broadened assignments and maintaining superior performance levels. |
|
| 2. If the overall evaluation is good, development plans should be discussed for possible growth in present position. The main objective will be to maintain or improve performance level. | |
| 3. If the overall evaluation is acceptable, the primary goal will be to enhance the employee's potential by improving weak areas through additional training and/or staff development | |
| 4. If the overall evaluation is fair or poor and the supervisor feels the employee's performance is correctable, a plan for corrective action should be developed and commitment to improve should be obtained from the employee. If performance is uncorrectable, the possibility of reassignment or termination shall be discussed with the employee. | |
3.4.4 Developing an Action Plan. In an appraisal discussion, four fundamental areas need to be covered: |
|
1. Employee's performance compared to
previously set goals and standards; |
|
4. Establishment of goals and standards for the next appraisal period. |
|
3.4.5 Conducting the Interview. The performance appraisal interview provides the supervisor with an opportunity to communicate openly with employees on the subject of performance. Supervisors should define problems clearly, set improvement goals and encourage employee participation. |
|
3.4.6 Interview Closing. During the final portion of the interview, supervisors and employees should attempt to summarize what was said in the course of the appraisal. Employees should leave the appraisal interview knowing what standards were used to evaluate their performance and how well they met their objectives. Agreement should be reached on needed development ways to maintain or improve performance, and the resources needed to perform at the desired level. Areas of disagreement should be acknowledged and discussed and employees should be informed of their right to appeal the appraisal. |
|
| 3.4.7 Comments and Recommendations. This section allows supervisors to provide employees with written feedback on their job performance. Recommendations for merit increases, promotions, transfers, and demotions should be clearly stated. | |
3.5 Employees shall be allowed the opportunity to provide written comments on their appraisal and overall rating, as well as to appeal their evaluation, if necessary. Once the employee and supervisor have signed the evaluation form, it will be forwarded to the next supervisory level for review and signature. 3.6 Performance evaluation forms will then be forwarded to the Human Resources Office. The Director of Human Resources will review all evaluations and comments and will distribute the evaluation forms as follow: |
|
1. Top two copies are retained in the Human Resources Office; |
|
2. The third copy is sent to the employee; and |
|
3. The last copy is sent to the employee's supervisor. |
|
3.7 Appeal Process. Employees may appeal their performance evaluation, to the next higher supervisory level, if they disagree with their appraisal. A decision on the appeal will be provided in writing to the employee, within ten working days, with a copy to the Human Resources Office. Performance evaluations may be appealed up to the vice president's level, following the chain of command. The vice president's decision will be final and binding. |
|
| 4. REVIEW AND RESPONSIBILITIES | |
Responsible Party (Reviewer): Vice President for Administration |
|
Review: Biennial |
|
| Reprint of original policy statement. Signed original on file in the President's Office. |